Forms and Templates
Homepage / Printable Da 2166 9 1 Template
Article Map

The DA Form 2166-9-1, commonly known as the NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, plays a crucial role in the evaluation process for non-commissioned officers in the U.S. Army. This form is not merely a bureaucratic requirement; it serves as a comprehensive tool for assessing an NCO's performance, potential, and professional development over a specified period. The form includes vital administrative data, such as the NCO's name, rank, and unit, ensuring that all evaluations are accurately attributed. It also outlines the roles of the rater and senior rater, who provide their assessments and signatures, confirming the authenticity of the evaluation. Moreover, the document emphasizes the importance of a detailed duty description, which captures the NCO's responsibilities and contributions within their unit. Performance evaluation is a significant aspect of this form, encompassing various attributes such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each of these areas is critically analyzed, with comments that reflect the NCO's adherence to Army values and overall effectiveness. Lastly, the form includes a section for the senior rater to assess the NCO's potential compared to peers, which can significantly influence future assignments and career progression. Understanding the intricacies of the DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for both evaluators and those being evaluated, as it directly impacts career trajectories within the Army.

Common mistakes

  1. Incorrect Personal Information: Filling out the name, SSN, or DOD ID number incorrectly can lead to significant delays. Double-check these details to ensure they match official documents.

  2. Missing Signatures: Both the rater and senior rater must sign the form. If any signature is missing, the form may be considered incomplete and returned for correction.

  3. Improper Dates: Dates need to be formatted correctly. Using the wrong format can cause confusion. Always use the YYYYMMDD format as specified in the instructions.

  4. Omitting Required Sections: Each part of the form serves a purpose. Leaving out sections like the duty description or performance evaluation can hinder the assessment process.

  5. Incorrect Email Addresses: Providing an incorrect email address for the rater or senior rater can create communication issues. Ensure that the email addresses end in .gov or .mil as required.

  6. Neglecting Counseling Dates: It's essential to include the correct counseling dates. This information is vital for tracking performance and development over time.

Find Common Documents

96well Plate - Useful for both small and large research teams.

Having a clear understanding of a rental agreement is essential for both landlords and tenants, as it helps prevent misunderstandings and protects their interests. For those looking to create a legally sound document, the California Templates can provide a helpful resource in drafting the necessary terms and conditions for renting a property.

State Form 43230 - Potential buyers can feel more confident in a deal when this document is presented.

Key takeaways

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to keep the following key takeaways in mind:

  • Accurate Information: Ensure that all personal details, including name, rank, and Social Security Number (SSN), are correct. Any inaccuracies may lead to complications in processing.
  • Submission Purpose: Clearly indicate the reason for submission. This helps in categorizing and prioritizing the evaluation report appropriately.
  • Rater and Senior Rater Details: Include complete information about the rater and senior rater. Their signatures and dates are crucial for validating the evaluation.
  • Performance Evaluation: Pay attention to the sections evaluating professionalism, attributes, and competencies. Each category should reflect the rated NCO's performance accurately.
  • Counseling Dates: Document all counseling dates accurately. This shows that the rated NCO has received the necessary guidance throughout the evaluation period.
  • Areas of Special Emphasis: Highlight any specific areas of focus in the duty description. This provides context for the rater's evaluations and can clarify expectations.
  • Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature confirms understanding of the report contents, but it does not imply agreement with the assessments. This distinction is important.
  • Appeals Process: Familiarize yourself with the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. Understanding this process can be beneficial for the rated NCO if they wish to contest any evaluations.
  • Review Requirements: Determine if a supplementary review is necessary. If so, ensure that the supplementary reviewer provides their signature and comments, as this adds an additional layer of oversight.

Da 2166 9 1 Example

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3;; the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I -­ ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II -­ AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III -­ DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV -­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV -­ PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V -­ SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES

Understanding Da 2166 9 1

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation report helps to assess their performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. It provides a structured way to document the NCO's duties, accomplishments, and areas for improvement over a specified period.

Who is responsible for filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The responsibility for completing the DA 2166 9 1 form primarily lies with the rater, who is typically the NCO's immediate supervisor. The rater must provide detailed information about the NCO's performance and duties. Additionally, the senior rater, who is usually a higher-ranking officer, reviews and signs the form to provide an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to peers. The rated NCO also signs the form to acknowledge that they have seen the completed report.

What information is required on the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form requires various pieces of information, including:

  • The rated NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, and contact information.
  • Details about the rater and senior rater, including their names, ranks, and signatures.
  • A description of the NCO's principal duties and areas of emphasis.
  • Performance evaluations across several attributes, such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement.
  • Information about the NCO's physical fitness, including APFT results and height/weight standards.

How does the evaluation process work?

The evaluation process begins with the rater observing and documenting the NCO's performance over a designated period. After gathering this information, the rater fills out the DA 2166 9 1 form, providing comments on various performance attributes. The senior rater then reviews the form, adds their insights, and assigns an overall potential rating. Finally, the rated NCO is given the opportunity to review the report and sign it, indicating they have seen the completed evaluation.

What should I do if I disagree with my evaluation?

If you disagree with your evaluation on the DA 2166 9 1 form, it is important to know that you have the right to appeal. The appeals process is outlined in AR 623-3. You should first discuss your concerns with your rater or senior rater. If the issue remains unresolved, you can formally submit an appeal, providing any supporting documentation or evidence that may help your case. It's essential to follow the established procedures to ensure your concerns are heard and considered.

How to Use Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important task that requires attention to detail. This form is used for the evaluation of non-commissioned officers (NCOs) and must be filled out accurately to ensure a proper assessment. Follow the steps below to complete the form correctly.

  1. Part I - Administrative Data:
    • Enter the rated NCO's full name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number.
    • Fill in the rank of the rated NCO.
    • Indicate the date of rank.
    • List the Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC).
    • Include the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
    • Enter the status code.
    • Provide the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
    • State the reason for submission.
    • Fill in the period covered, specifying the start and end dates.
    • Indicate the rated months.
    • Fill in any non-rated codes.
    • List the number of enclosures.
    • Provide the rated NCO's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
  2. Part II - Authentication:
    • Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
    • Have the rater sign and date the form (YYYYMMDD).
    • Fill in the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
    • Provide the rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
    • Enter the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
    • Provide the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
    • Have the senior rater sign and date the form (YYYYMMDD).
    • Fill in the senior rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
    • Provide the senior rater's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
    • If applicable, fill in the supplementary reviewer's information.
    • Indicate if a review is required (Yes/No) and provide comments.
    • Have the supplementary reviewer sign and date the form (YYYYMMDD).
    • Provide the supplementary reviewer's email address (must be .gov or .mil).
  3. Part III - Duty Description (Rater):
    • Enter the principal duty title.
    • Provide the duty MOSC.
    • Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and dollars.
    • List areas of special emphasis.
    • Include any appointed duties.
  4. Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
    • Record APFT results (Pass/Fail/Profile) and the date.
    • Provide height and weight, and indicate if within standards.
    • Evaluate character and provide comments.
    • Assess presence and provide comments.
    • Evaluate intellect and provide comments.
    • Assess leadership qualities and provide comments.
    • Evaluate development abilities and provide comments.
    • Assess achievement and provide comments.
    • Provide overall performance rating.
  5. Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
    • Select the appropriate box for the rated NCO's potential.
    • Provide comments regarding the rated NCO's potential.
    • List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

Once you have completed the form, ensure all sections are filled out accurately. Review the information for any errors or omissions. After verifying everything is correct, submit the form as required by your chain of command.